Researched and fact-checked in-house against primary literature and regulator records. Not reviewed by a named clinician — how we work.
Evidence-rated reference Updated August 2026
We sell nothing. No vendor sponsorship. Editorial policy
Pepteyes .com
In Clinical TrialsNot approved Gut & Gastrointestinal Evidence 3/5 · Moderate
Larazotide Acetate: 8 amino acids (from the sequence record) · Gut & Gastrointestinal · evidence 3 of 5

Larazotide Acetate

Also known as AT-1001 · INN-202

Octapeptide tight-junction regulator (zonulin antagonist)

Larazotide Acetate — investigational Illustration of a single-use glass vial labelled Larazotide Acetate, CAS 258818-34-7, containing capsules. CAS 258818-34-7 LarazotideAcetate INVESTIGATIONAL CAS 258818-34-7 LarazotideAcetate INVESTIGATIONAL

Supplied as capsules or tablets

Gut & Gastrointestinal

At a glance

Ten answers, each one line. Open any row for the detail behind it.

What it does The furthest any "leaky gut" therapy has progressed through formal drug development — all…

The furthest any "leaky gut" therapy has progressed through formal drug development — all the way to phase 3, where it failed. That result is important context for the intestinal-permeability claims made across the supplement industry.

Half-life Minimal systemic absorption — acts locally in the gut lumen — Documented

Minimal systemic absorption — acts locally in the gut lumen

Typical studied dose No established dose. Each trial protocol fixes its own and publishes it… — Depends on the study

No established dose. Each trial protocol fixes its own and publishes it in the registry entry, under medical supervision that is part of the dose. There is no approved amount for use outside a study.

How often it is used Whatever the protocol specifies. The registry entry for a given study… — Depends on the study

Whatever the protocol specifies. The registry entry for a given study states its interval; nothing establishes one outside a study.

How it is taken Oral — Documented

Oral

Main side effects Failed phase 3 · Not available · Headache and gastrointestinal symptoms — Carries serious risk

Failed phase 3 — The definitive trial stopped for futility. This is the most important thing to know about it.

Not available — No approved product; no lawful supply.

Headache and gastrointestinal symptoms — The most commonly reported events, generally mild.

Storage before mixing Kept dry, sealed and at room temperature unless the label says…

Kept dry, sealed and at room temperature unless the label says otherwise. Moisture is what shortens the life of a capsule or tablet.

Shelf life after mixing Nothing to mix — it is not supplied as a powder. The relevant date is…

Nothing to mix — it is not supplied as a powder. The relevant date is the one printed on the product.

Evidence level 3/5 · Moderate — Depends on the study

Small or early-phase human trials, or good controlled topical human data.

Regulatory status In Clinical Trials — Depends on the study

Reached phase 3 for celiac disease; the trial did not meet its primary endpoint and was discontinued in 2022. Not approved. Investigational; development discontinued.

Overview

The furthest any "leaky gut" therapy has progressed through formal drug development — all the way to phase 3, where it failed. That result is important context for the intestinal-permeability claims made across the supplement industry.

Investigational — not approvedInvestigational; development discontinued.

At a glance
Regulatory statusReached phase 3 for celiac disease; the trial did not meet its primary endpoint and was discontinued in 2022. Not approved.
Drug classOctapeptide tight-junction regulator (zonulin antagonist)
RouteOral
Half-lifeMinimal systemic absorption — acts locally in the gut lumen
Evidence rating
3/5 Moderate Evidence rating 3 out of 5: Moderate
Small or early-phase human trials, or good controlled topical human data.
Studied inMultiple phase 2 trials in celiac disease showing symptom benefit; the CeDLara phase 3 trial, stopped for futility at interim analysis.

Larazotide Acetate sequence & structure

Larazotide Acetate is a 8-residue linear peptide with a free C-terminal acid; molecular weight 725.85 Da.

Amino acid sequence (N-terminus → C-terminus)
H-GGVLVQPG-OH
Three-letterH-Gly-Gly-Val-Leu-Val-Gln-Pro-Gly-OH
Length8 amino acid residues
ModificationsNone — an unmodified chain of standard L-amino acids
Molecular formulaC32H55N9O10
Molecular weight725.85 Da (average, free base)
SMILESCC(C)C[C@H](NC(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)CNC(=O)CN)C(C)C)C(=O)N[C@H](C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(N)=O)C(=O)N1CCC[C@H]1C(=O)NCC(=O)O)C(C)C
IdentifiersCAS 258818-34-7 · PubChem CID 9810532 · DrugBank DB05645
SourcesPubChem CID 9810532 (formula, MW, SMILES)ChEMBL CHEMBL2105646 (INN/USAN, HELM sequence)FDA GSRS UNII ZN3R5560ZV (subunit sequence GGVLVQPG)KEGG DRUG D09351 (USAN/INN, formula, CAS)ChEBI 177799 (formula, average mass, SMILES, CAS, DrugBank link)

Unmodified linear octapeptide of all-L standard residues (free amine, free acid); clinical material is larazotide acetate (CAS 881851-50-9), whereas 258818-34-7 and the formula/MW here refer to the free base. Research codes AT-1001 and AT-2347 both map to this molecule; INN-202 is a later development code for the same drug. UNII ZN3R5560ZV; DrugBank DB05645 confirmed via the ChEBI cross-reference (go.drugbank.com refuses automated fetches).

Record confidence: high — two independent authoritative sources agree on the sequence and modifications. Every sequence on the site is listed with its sources on the peptide sequences index.

How it works

Antagonises zonulin signalling to tighten intestinal epithelial tight junctions, reducing paracellular passage of gliadin peptides. It is designed to act locally in the gut lumen with negligible systemic absorption.

Evidence base

Rated 3 of 5 — Moderate. Small or early-phase human trials, or good controlled topical human data.

  • A well-run program with a negative definitive result — genuinely useful evidence.

Benefits and risks, weighed against the evidence

Every entry below carries the strength of the evidence behind it — three bars for strong human data, two for moderate, one for preliminary or preclinical work. The two columns are not equal by design: where a compound has more documented risk than demonstrated benefit, the lists say so.

Reported benefits

3 entries · 1 on strong human evidence

  1. Phase 2 symptom improvement in celiac disease

    Earlier randomized trials showed reduced gastrointestinal symptoms in patients on a gluten-free diet with persistent symptoms.

    Evidence: Moderate evidence
  2. Excellent safety profile

    Negligible systemic absorption; adverse events comparable to placebo across a large trial program.

    Evidence: Strong evidence
  3. Validated a mechanism

    Demonstrated that tight-junction modulation is pharmacologically achievable, even if the clinical payoff was not delivered.

    Evidence: Moderate evidence

Risks and cautions

3 entries · 1 serious or common

  1. Failed phase 3

    The definitive trial stopped for futility. This is the most important thing to know about it.

    Evidence: Serious
  2. Not available

    No approved product; no lawful supply.

    Evidence: Moderate evidence
  3. Headache and gastrointestinal symptoms

    The most commonly reported events, generally mild.

    Evidence: Minor

Counts are not a score. A single serious risk can outweigh several well-supported benefits, and a long benefit list built on preclinical work outweighs nothing at all.

Opinion — what people actually report

4 themes · 1 reported benefit · 1 reported problem

This is the weakest tier on this site. These are themes drawn from public discussion — forums, subreddits and patient threads — not from trials. There is no control group, no denominator, and no way to confirm that what someone injected matched its label. People post when a result is dramatic and when something goes wrong, and rarely when nothing happens, so treat everything below as a description of the conversation rather than of the compound. The bars count how often a thing is said, not how well it is supported.

  1. Hope followed by disappointment Practical note. Dominant theme: Comes up in most discussions of this compound.

    The dominant arc in coeliac communities. Years of anticipation as the leading candidate, then the phase 3 failure, and the discussion has largely gone quiet since.

  2. Some reported fewer symptoms after accidental gluten exposure Reported benefit. Recurring: Raised regularly, though not by everyone.

    From trial participants and from people using research-chemical versions, and hard to separate from variability in exposure.

  3. Many reported no difference Reported problem. Recurring: Raised regularly, though not by everyone.

    Prominent, and consistent with how the trial ended.

  4. The tight-junction idea remains attractive Practical note. Recurring: Raised regularly, though not by everyone.

    Interest in the zonulin and intestinal permeability mechanism persists well beyond this specific compound, including in communities discussing conditions where the concept is much less established.

Where the reports and the evidence part ways

The community's trajectory tracked the evidence honestly: enthusiasm during promising phase 2 results, then acceptance when the phase 3 trial did not meet its endpoint and development was discontinued. What outlived the drug is the "leaky gut" framing it popularised, which now circulates in wellness contexts far beyond coeliac disease and with far less support than it had here. The mechanism was plausible and specific; its afterlife has been neither.

Questions & answers

Readers on Larazotide Acetate

Questions and answers from readers, under generated names. Nothing here has been checked or reviewed by the site and none of it is medical advice. It is the least verified thing on this page — and it is here because people ask each other these things anyway, and most of the other places they can ask are run by sellers.

0 questions · 0 answers

Other readers answer these. Ask about Larazotide Acetate and the people who have actually looked into it can reply. You post under a generated name — two ordinary words — and that is the only thing anyone else sees. Your address is never shown on the page, never sold and never used for marketing. What we keep, and why.
  • Your name here is generated. Nobody picks one, nobody can take another's, and the same address always gets the same name.
  • A person reads every post before it appears, which is why this section has no spam and no sellers in it.
  • You can delete anything you write, or remove everything and your address, from this page at any time.

No questions yet. Ask the first one above — it takes one box and an email address.

How names work, and the house rules

Names. Every verified address is given one generated name — two ordinary words — and keeps it. Nobody chooses a name and nobody can take another's. Posts marked desk were written by the site's own editorial desk, usually to open a thread; they carry a generated name like everyone else's and are held to the site's rules, which means they never state an amount.

What is not allowed. Selling, sourcing, vendor names, coupon codes and "message me" — posts that read that way are held and usually removed. Personal medical details you would not want public. Abuse. Instructions framed as what someone else should do.

What this is not. A reader's report of what happened to them is a report, not a finding, and an answer here is one person's view. Nothing in this section changes the evidence rating above it. If something you read here would change what you take, take it to a pharmacist or physician first.

Your data. Delete any post of yours at any time, or remove everything you have written together with your name. Details in the privacy notice.

Who should avoid it

  • Not applicable — no lawful supply exists

If used under medical supervision, monitor

  • Not applicable

Commonly confused with

These mix-ups cause real harm — two products sold under one name, or two molecules whose effects run in opposite directions.

BPC-157 Research Use Only Evidence 1/5

Both marketed for "leaky gut". Larazotide is the only tight-junction drug to reach phase 3 — where it failed. BPC-157 has never had a published randomized human trial at all.

Compare side by side

Investigational; development discontinued.

Infographic

Larazotide Acetate — benefits & risks at a glance Download SVG
Infographic summarising the benefits and risks of Larazotide Acetate, from pepteyes.com

Where to read further

We link to live literature searches rather than a frozen citation list, so you always see current results — including anything published after our last review.

gut healthceliacfailed phase 3tight junction

Related peptides in Gut & Gastrointestinal

Terms used on this page

Phase 3 Trial
A Phase 3 trial is the large confirmatory study, powered for a prespecified clinical endpoint, on which a marketing application and the resulting product label are built.
Adverse Event (AE)
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in someone receiving a medicine, recorded whether or not the drug caused it, which is why an event table is not a harm table.
Placebo and Placebo Control
A placebo is an inactive intervention matched to the real one in appearance and route, used as a control arm so that improvement caused by the drug can be separated from improvement that would occur anyway.
Phase 2 Trial
A Phase 2 trial is the first test of a compound in the target patient population, sized to find a workable dose and an early efficacy signal rather than to prove clinical benefit.

This page is educational information, not medical advice. It cannot account for your medical history, medications, or risk factors. Do not start, stop or change any treatment based on it. Speak to a qualified healthcare professional who knows your case.